‘Science’ shows nothing of the kind, you are confusing scientific research with green propaganda. More and more properly conducted research projects which use empirical evidence rather than statistical projections generated by mathematical models which have been fed ‘adjusted data’ are suggesting solar activity is responsible for the climate events we are witnessing.
Wind turbines do not gernerate electricity when the wind does not reach a certain speed (approx 50% of the time according to research,), solar panels do not generate electricity when the sun does not shine (nor are they commercially viable when it is below 45 degrees or 135 degrees from horizontal.) And pumped storage systems use a lot more energy than they generate. So going carbon neutral in the foreseeable future without building many new nuclear plants is a completely unrealistic ambition.
And while green activists talk of being carbon neutral (i.e. trashing the economies of the liberal democracies,) China, Russia, India, Brazil, Nigeria, Indonesia and other third world nations that are excluded from schemes to achieve carbon neutrality are rubbing their hands with glee at the prospect that their nations will become the great economic powers in the second half of the 21st century and their ruling elites will join the Rothschild’s, Rockefellers, Van der Bilts, Oppenheimers, Buffets, Waltons, Bettancourts, Agnellis, and other super — rich families whose wealth is mostly hidden in offshore tax havens.
Forget Carbon Dioxide, it’s harmless and essential to life on earth (what do you think carbon based lifeforms, of which you and I are examples, are made of?) Worry about the mountains of single use plastic that are so harmful to animals, plants and everything, and the carcinogenous toxic shite scientists are putting in our food to make it prettier. Science may wipe out humanity and many other species by the end of the century but rest assured, some way, in some form, life on earth will continue.